\n
Three Workshop Examples
\nThree ways to network & interview people online (inspired by Liberating Structures):
\n
\n1: Celebrity Interview
\nWhat: Instead of boring presentations, host a well-prepared interview. (30 - 45 minutes)
\nWhy: Engage a whole group and boost a connection between an expert and the audience.
\nHow:
\nI use this technique a lot in Design Sprints. We usually do a round of 3 to 5 interviews before going to the next workshop exercise.
\n(A good next step can be to ask the group to visualize what they have learned during the interview, for example, in a Customer Journey Map.)
\n
\n2: Impromptu Networking
\nWhat: Facilitate spontaneous interactions to build connections and share knowledge. (20 minutes)
\nWhy: Encourages informal knowledge sharing and relationship building in a low-pressure environment.
\nHow:
\nThis technique is particularly effective in workshops aimed at cross functional collaboration, as it breaks down silos and encourages diverse input.
\n
\n3: Appreciative Interviews
\nWhat: Conduct interviews focused on positive experiences and strengths. (45 - 60 minutes)
\nWhy: Builds a positive atmosphere and helps uncover hidden assets and opportunities.
\nHow:
\nThis technique is excellent for fostering a positive mindset and uncovering strengths and success stories that can be replicated or built upon in future work.
\n
\nTwo Async Tips
\n
\n1: Skill Share Sessions
\nReal-time knowledge sharing is often used as an excuse to compel team members back into the office.
\n\"You can only grow and learn at the office.\"
\nThis approach is not only inconvenient but also inefficient. It overlooks the challenges of coordinating calendars and disrupts the balance of work and personal life.
\nYes, real-time knowledge sharing can be a great way to share knowledge. But it's not the only way.
\nA shift to a library of pre-recorded mini-training sessions, shared by team members, can be a flexible alternative.
\nDomain experts from the team can share their insights at their convenience, and other team members can access this valuable knowledge when it fits their schedule.
\nCombining this method with real-time knowledge sharing creates a culture of continuous, accessible learning. Free from the constraints of time and location.
\n
\n2: Async Design Critiques
Similarly, the traditional way of design critiques often hinges on real-time, in-person sessions, subtly reinforcing the outdated notion, \"True collaboration only happens face-to-face.\"
This mindset not only limits the scope of feedback but also makes it harder for future team members to understand decisions being made.
\nIn-person critiques have their merits. But they're not the only way for effective collaboration.
\n(In fact, forcing synchronous sessions only can lead to rushed feedback, overlooked details, and a skewed work-life balance.)
\nAsync design critiques, where feedback is shared in a common digital space (like Loom, Notion, Miro or Google Docs), offers a richer alternative.
\nTeam members can provide detailed, considered feedback at a time that suits their individual schedules and thought processes.
\n
\nOne Question For Your Team
\n
\nThat's all for this week. If you enjoyed today's issue, please reply (it helps with deliverability). If you didn't, you can unsubscribe via the link👇.
\nSee you next Wednesday — Arthur
\nPs. Whenever you are ready, there are 3 ways I can help you:
\nJoin 5.000+ professionals and get our weekly newsletter for practical workshop & AI-assisted teamwork tips.
This week's newsletter is about engaging ways to online networking & interviewing, async skill sharing, and celebrating success.
Let's go!
– Arthur
Three Workshop Examples
Three ways to network & interview people online (inspired by Liberating Structures):
1: Celebrity Interview
What: Instead of boring presentations, host a well-prepared interview. (30 - 45 minutes)
Why: Engage a whole group and boost a connection between an expert and the audience.
How:
I use this technique a lot in Design Sprints. We usually do a round of 3 to 5 interviews before going to the next workshop exercise.
(A good next step can be to ask the group to visualize what they have learned during the interview, for example, in a Customer Journey Map.)
2: Impromptu Networking
What: Facilitate spontaneous interactions to build connections and share knowledge. (20 minutes)
Why: Encourages informal knowledge sharing and relationship building in a low-pressure environment.
How:
This technique is particularly effective in workshops aimed at cross functional collaboration, as it breaks down silos and encourages diverse input.
3: Appreciative Interviews
What: Conduct interviews focused on positive experiences and strengths. (45 - 60 minutes)
Why: Builds a positive atmosphere and helps uncover hidden assets and opportunities.
How:
This technique is excellent for fostering a positive mindset and uncovering strengths and success stories that can be replicated or built upon in future work.
Two Async Tips
1: Skill Share Sessions
Real-time knowledge sharing is often used as an excuse to compel team members back into the office.
"You can only grow and learn at the office."
This approach is not only inconvenient but also inefficient. It overlooks the challenges of coordinating calendars and disrupts the balance of work and personal life.
Yes, real-time knowledge sharing can be a great way to share knowledge. But it's not the only way.
A shift to a library of pre-recorded mini-training sessions, shared by team members, can be a flexible alternative.
Domain experts from the team can share their insights at their convenience, and other team members can access this valuable knowledge when it fits their schedule.
Combining this method with real-time knowledge sharing creates a culture of continuous, accessible learning. Free from the constraints of time and location.
2: Async Design Critiques
Similarly, the traditional way of design critiques often hinges on real-time, in-person sessions, subtly reinforcing the outdated notion, "True collaboration only happens face-to-face."
This mindset not only limits the scope of feedback but also makes it harder for future team members to understand decisions being made.
In-person critiques have their merits. But they're not the only way for effective collaboration.
(In fact, forcing synchronous sessions only can lead to rushed feedback, overlooked details, and a skewed work-life balance.)
Async design critiques, where feedback is shared in a common digital space (like Loom, Notion, Miro or Google Docs), offers a richer alternative.
Team members can provide detailed, considered feedback at a time that suits their individual schedules and thought processes.
One Question For Your Team
That's all for this week. If you enjoyed today's issue, please reply (it helps with deliverability). If you didn't, you can unsubscribe via the link👇.
See you next Wednesday — Arthur
Ps. Whenever you are ready, there are 3 ways I can help you:
Join 5.000+ professionals and get our weekly newsletter for practical workshop & AI-assisted teamwork tips.